Prediction of Stacey Fung [272nd] vs Anna Sinclair Rogers [270th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L W L W L L
Form
W W L W W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Fung 0 - 3 Rogers
They have played 7 sets in total, with Fung winning 1 and Rogers winning 6. The last match between Fung and Rogers was at the W50 Birmingham, 13-02-2025, Second, I.hard with Anna Sinclair Rogers getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stacey Fung | 0 |
| Anna Sinclair Rogers | 3 |
| Fung | Stats | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| 25% (2-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (16-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 3 |
| 272 | Ranking | 270 |
| 222 | Highest Rank | 264 |
| 28 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 3 |
| 63% (176-105) | Career Total W/L | 57% (120-89) |
| $8,800 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 2 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Stacey Fung
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Stacey Fung
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Stacey Fung
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 3 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 21 | Games Won | 40 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:49:20 | Average Match Time | 1:49:20 |
| 55% (102/187) | 1st Serve % | 67% (142/213) |
| 56% (57/102) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (92/142) |
| 39% (33/85) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (36/71) |
| 36% (9/25) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 55% (17/31) |
| 40% (85/213) | Return Points Win % | 52% (97/187) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stacey Fung vs Anna Sinclair Rogers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fung 0 - 3 Rogers
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fung has won 37.48% of points on their second serve, while Rogers has won 41.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fung, in recent form, has won 47.13% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rogers has won 48.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.94% and 33.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fung has saved 46.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rogers has saved 52.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fung has won 57.89% of matches played (W/L 33/ 24), with Rogers winning 66.25% (W/L 53/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fung has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 40/ 23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Rogers has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 30/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 23/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Fung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 32/ 22), where as Rogers has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.25% of matches (W/L 53/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Fung winning 0 times and Rogers being victorious 3 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Fung winning 1 and Rogers winning 6. The last match between Fung and Rogers was at the W50 Birmingham, 13-02-2025, Second, I.hard with Anna Sinclair Rogers getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fung and Rogers have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fung winning 0 times and Rogers 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fung winning 0, and Rogers 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fung has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.86 while Rogers has played against players with an average rank of 226.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fung has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rogers has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fung has converted 38.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rogers has converted 41.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Stacey Fung vs Anna Sinclair Rogers Best Odds For The Match
Stacey Fung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Daavettila
Player
Stacey Fung
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
2
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
27%
(
8 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Stacey Fung
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Julie Belgraver
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
4
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Stacey Fung
66%
(
80 of
121)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
111)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
49%
(
59 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
114
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Stacey Fung
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arantxa Rus
Player
Stacey Fung
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Weronika Falkowska
Player
Stacey Fung
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
4-6 6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Arianna Zucchini
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Anna Sinclair Rogers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Jose Portillo Ramirez
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Lea Ma
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentina Ryser
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
61 of
87)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Alevtina Ibragimova
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Victoria Chramcova
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Katarina Kuzmova
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Mia Ristic
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Fung vs Rogers?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Fung Vs Rogers is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (176/105) | Win/Loss | 57% (120/89) |
| 62% (390/236) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (264/223) |
| 55% (3127/2513) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2348/2186) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 353 | Aces Total | 383 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 368 | Total Double Faults | 544 |
| 1:34:54 | Average Match Time | 1:30:25 |
| 243.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 268.07 |
| 67% (10259/15301) | 1st Serve % | 66% (8606/13058) |
| 62% (6319/10259) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5316/8606) |
| 48% (2407/5043) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2013/4452) |
| 49% (1059/2173) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (738/1577) |
| 48% (7531/15767) | Return Points Win % | 45% (5785/12825) |
| 63% (173/274) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (117/205) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 64% (30/47) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (21/36) |
| 42% (29/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (43/67) |
| 87% (188/163) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (101/90) |
| 13% (188/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (101/11) |
| 14% (93/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (108/30) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
